Crudely Holed Coins

1st June 2015 — 13 Comments
Holed coin

© UKDFD 48201

In 2009 I wrote about disgruntled detectorist Simon Hall, who attended an organised dig on a Good Friday when over 70 hammered coins were found. Although he had plenty of signals he was one of only a handful people who didn’t collect. Today I retell that story and add a little more! Undaunted and determined not to be outdone, Simon packed his gear on Easter Monday and set off to explore one of his ‘own’ sites to find the silver coin that had eluded him.

Situated next to a 12th century church and on pasture for as long as he could remember, the field had recently been deep-ploughed and set with potatoes. The signs were good and it wasn’t long before he was cradling a complete, but crudely holed Charles II penny, which he carefully placed in his finds’ case.

Charles II

Image Charles II coin courtesy of UKDFD

Things were looking up! He casually ran his detector over the same spot and, to his surprise, had another signal. The coin was another another Charles penny, again with a small hole. He checked again and was rewarded with a similar coin, which like the others was crudely pierced. Simon said:

You can imagine what was running through my mind as I made yet another scan of the hole. My heart was beating fast as I recover a Commonwealth penny – my very first! It was also holed!

Commonwealth

Similar Commonwealth coin supplied by Randy Dee – © RD

Although scouring the site very carefully no more coins came to light, but he made a careful note of the find spot – who knows what the next turn of the plough will reveal! It can only be a guess, but when these coins were originally lost, could they have been secured by some kind of string now disintegrated? It certainly looked as though the coins had been pierced with a nail or punch because of the crudeness of the hole and deformation of the metal. And what about the significance of those holed coins found on one of the most holy days of the year?

The real answer to the crude holes is probably to do with the Great Recoinage of 1696, one of the greatest monetary events in history as explained below.

RECOINAGE OF 1696 – From UKDFD

The coin is nail-bored in the centre, probably as a consequence of measures taken during the Great Recoinage of 1696 (albeit not truly a hammered coin at which the provision was aimed):

“Persons having unclipt hammered Monies before 10th Feb. 1695, to cause the same to be punched.; After 10th Feb. no unclipt hammered Monies to be current unless so punched.; Receiving, &c. such appearing to be clipt; Penalty; Quarter Sessions empowered to determine Offences.

And in regard such of the Coins of this Realme formerly made with the Hammer and not by the Mill and Presse and which doe att this time remain Whole and Unclipt will still bee most liable and subject to that pernicious Crime of Clipping or Rounding by wicked Persons who regard their owne unjust Lucre more then the Preservation of their native Countrey. For the better Prevention thereof bee it further enacted by the. Authority aforesaid That every Person having such unclipt hammered Moneys in his her or their Hands…doe before the Tenth Day of February One thousand six hundred ninety five or before they dispose of the same cause such unclipt Moneys to bee struck through about the Middle of every Piece with a solid Punch that shall make a Hole without diminishing the Silver And that after the said Tenth Day of February noe unclipt hammered Moneys (that is to say) such Pieces as have both Rings. or the greatest part of the Letters appearing thereon shall bee Current unlesse it be soe struck through And if any Piece struck through shall appeare afterwards to bee clipt noe Person shall tender or receive the same in Payment under the Penalty of. forfeiting as much as the clipt Moneys soe puncht through shall amount to in Tale to bee recovered to the Use of the Poor of the Parish where such Money shall bee soe tendred or received And His Majesties Justices of the Peace or the major part of them in the General Quarter Session upon Complaint to bee made to them of such Offence are hereby impowered to take Cognizance thereof and to determine the same and for that purpose to cause the Parties complained of to appear before them and in case of Conviction to issue their Warrant or Warrants to levy such Penalty upon the Goods and Chattells of the Offenders”

_______________________________________________________________________

After finding similar holed coins, detectorist Paul Mower has an alternative explanation. The field in which his coins were found had a connection with a site of public gallows. He reckons that when thieves and forgers were hanged, a coin was nailed to the gallows as a reminder of their misdemeanour. It left them in no doubt as to the reason for the death penalty. Paul also said that a similar situation existed within the Royal Navy. A sailor found to be thieving from the ship’s provisions or another crew member would often be hung from the yard arm, a coin affixed to the timber …

Spade

Spade Guinea – for illustration purposes only – © JW

Paul’s theory was new to me and as I couldn’t corroborate his story, I decided to ask best-selling author of medieval thrillers, Karen Maitland, if she could add anything. I’ve read all of Karen’s works and was particularly interested in The Gallows Curse, as I know that her research into each book she writes is meticulous. Here’s what she said:

I’ve had a look through my books but can’t see any reference that one specifically. It seems highly likely since whatever the punishment, the symbol of or evidence of it was usually hung round their neck or nailed to the pillory or gallows both to remind the criminal. More importantly to warn as passers-by of the penalties for such a crime especially as many would not be able to read. 

maitland-karen

Karen

There was also the superstitious belief in the Middle Ages and probably later too, that if you attached the evidence or symbol of the crime to the condemned body or put it on the gallows or on the gibbet or in the grave with them, the devil would recognise it and take them straight to hell where they would be punished. This would ensure the vengeful ghost wouldn’t hang around the town or village and torment the living. So even when the authorities themselves didn’t do it, they are tales of villagers or townsfolk taking it upon themselves to do put evidence of the crime on or near the corpse for the devil to spot as he flew over.

I mentioned Karen in an earlier blog post entitled She Didn’t Wear Knickers. I hasten to add that this provocative title was a reference to Jane Austen … but you’ll have to read it to understand the context! Unfortunately, the original post was lost, but I hope top resurrect it sometime in the near future.

______________________________________________________________________

NB: NO COINS WERE HURT IN THE PREPARATION OF THIS BLOGPOST

The ‘coin’ picture above was made with an imitation spade guinea made from brass that I bought from the local market for the princely sum of 10p. They were made in huge numbers during the 19th century for use as gaming counters or for advertising. SEE HERE. Some examples copy very closely the design of a proper George III guinea and are occasionally mistaken by detectorists for the real thing!

________________________________________________________________________

From an earlier piece of writing –  2006

ExpensiveHole219

Click to enlarge … slightly!

UPDATE

I have now found a copy of the original coins found by Simon

Holed coins

© SH – Click to enlarge

John

Posts Twitter

The copyright owner of content on this blog is John Winter, unless noted otherwise. Every effort has been made to assure no material was used without permission. If you are the owner and find that your material was inadvertently used without permission then please contact me. Your material will be removed immediately or your copyright message will be added, whatever you prefer.

13 responses to Crudely Holed Coins

  1. interesting reading as always John.
    I think there must have been a lot of hangings considering the number of coins with holes.
    I prefer the simple view that some coins were so small that threading them onto a string was the easiest way of not losing them.

  2. I shall have to go back to Gallows Hill for more detecting now that bit of information has been divulged, over the years I have found quite a few of these holed coins and I always thought that they had been disfigured for a dislike to the Sovereign on religious grounds. You live and learn.

  3. There are other superstitions regarding holed coins. In a number of parts of the Country there are “wishing trees” these are often near to sacred springs. People would nail coins to a tree to increase their chance of fertility or to be healed, it was a form of votive offering to the spirits.
    On completion of a sailing ship and the main mast was raised coins as good luck charms would be nailed to the mast. The Romans also did this, but in their case it was to pay Charon the ferryman of the underworld if the ship sank.
    I am sure there are other coin superstitions too!

  4. Thank you again John! Another interesting and thought-provoking article. I had always believed that a hole was a hole was a hole; but a hole with, say, a nice gold hammy surrounding it is much to be preferred to one surrounded by the metal I typically find…
    Cheers again!

  5. Maybe a few different explanations but the re-coinage seems the most likely because of the number being found. The mast on the ship theory sounds interesting and I wonder if any have been found on shipwrecks.

  6. Very informative John, everyday is a schoolday.

  7. ‘A day without learning is a day lost’, thank you John.

  8. Thank you for a great write up and your time researching

    It’s so important to have this type of information to give more insight to the history and customs of the time these coins were around. It gives the finds a background story and adds even more historical value
    Steve_T

  9. Interesting article. I have a charles I briot milled ebor (York) shilling in EF grade apart from a large hole punched in to the left of the kings portrait. As its not dead centre and rather large I’ve always felt it was not done during the 1696 recoinage. I’ve often wondered if it was used as a touch piece or mementoe for a Royalist after the death of charles. Its hardly seen circulation that i am certain of.

Trackbacks and Pingbacks:

  1. Crudely Holed Coins - 1st June 2015

    […] a complete, but crudely holed Charles II penny, which he carefully placed in his finds' case. Crudely Holed Coins | John Winter http://www.johnwinter.net Scribbler: BRINGING HISTORY to LIFE Reply With […]

Would you like to leave a response?

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.